Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-04-23

[PATCH 2/5] dma: mxs-dma: make platform_device_id more generic

From: Dong Aisheng <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-23 03:58:48
Also in: linux-devicetree

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:01:18AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:46:34PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
quoted
From: Dong Aisheng <redacted>

Rewrite mxs_dma_is_apbh and mxs_dma_is_apbx in order to support
other SoCs like imx6q and reform the platform_device_id for the
better further dt support.
Nice cleanup.  But I would like to ask more.
quoted
Cc: Vinod Koul <redacted>
Cc: Dan Williams <redacted>
Cc: Shawn Guo <redacted>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Marek Vasut <redacted>
Cc: Huang Shijie <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c           |    4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c           |    4 +-
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-dma.c |   14 ++--
 drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c                    |  111 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fsl/mxs-dma.h              |   12 +---
 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c
index e3ac52c..1e67b85 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx23.c
@@ -427,8 +427,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("duart", NULL, uart_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.0", NULL, uart_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("rtc", NULL, rtc_clk)
-	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-dma-apbh", NULL, hbus_clk)
-	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-dma-apbx", NULL, xbus_clk)
+	_REGISTER_CLOCK("imx23-dma-apbh", NULL, hbus_clk)
+	_REGISTER_CLOCK("imx23-dma-apbx", NULL, xbus_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-mmc.0", NULL, ssp_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-mmc.1", NULL, ssp_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK(NULL, "usb", usb_clk)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
index 1867a17..cca2cf7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c
@@ -625,8 +625,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-auart.4", NULL, uart_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("rtc", NULL, rtc_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("pll2", NULL, pll2_clk)
-	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-dma-apbh", NULL, hbus_clk)
-	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-dma-apbx", NULL, xbus_clk)
+	_REGISTER_CLOCK("imx28-dma-apbh", NULL, hbus_clk)
+	_REGISTER_CLOCK("imx28-dma-apbx", NULL, xbus_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-mmc.0", NULL, ssp0_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-mmc.1", NULL, ssp1_clk)
 	_REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-mmc.2", NULL, ssp2_clk)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-dma.c
index 6a0202b..aff4813 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-dma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/devices/platform-dma.c
@@ -32,17 +32,19 @@ static struct platform_device *__init mxs_add_dma(const char *devid,
 
 static int __init mxs_add_mxs_dma(void)
 {
-	char *apbh = "mxs-dma-apbh";
-	char *apbx = "mxs-dma-apbx";
+	char *mx23_apbh = "imx23-dma-apbh";
+	char *mx23_apbx = "imx23-dma-apbx";
+	char *mx28_apbh = "imx28-dma-apbh";
+	char *mx28_apbx = "imx28-dma-apbx";
 
 	if (cpu_is_mx23()) {
-		mxs_add_dma(apbh, MX23_APBH_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
-		mxs_add_dma(apbx, MX23_APBX_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
+		mxs_add_dma(mx23_apbh, MX23_APBH_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
+		mxs_add_dma(mx23_apbx, MX23_APBX_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
 	}
 
 	if (cpu_is_mx28()) {
-		mxs_add_dma(apbh, MX28_APBH_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
-		mxs_add_dma(apbx, MX28_APBX_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
+		mxs_add_dma(mx28_apbh, MX28_APBH_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
+		mxs_add_dma(mx28_apbx, MX28_APBX_DMA_BASE_ADDR);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
With soc specific hook introduced, we can remove this mxs_add_mxs_dma
call completely.
Yes, it's true.
A mx23/mx28_soc_init can do it well.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
index b0051a8..51a29f9 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mxs-dma.c
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
 #define HW_APBHX_CTRL2				0x020
 #define HW_APBHX_CHANNEL_CTRL			0x030
 #define BP_APBHX_CHANNEL_CTRL_RESET_CHANNEL	16
-#define HW_APBH_VERSION				(cpu_is_mx23() ? 0x3f0 : 0x800)
+#define HW_APBH_VERSION_IMX23			0x3f0
+#define HW_APBH_VERSION_IMX28			0x800
Since the VERSION is broken for identifying the dma type and we are
introduce dma type field, I would suggest to remove the use of VERSION
completely and use mxs_dma_type pbh_is_old()           (mxs_dma->everywhere.
Remove HW_APBH_VERSION_*?
But i see the some other places in original code still need to use it.
Like:
#define apbh_is_old()	(mxs_dma->version < APBH_VERSION_LATEST)
..
#define HW_APBHX_CHn_NXTCMDAR(n) \
        (((dma_is_apbh() && apbh_is_old()) ? 0x050 : 0x110) + (n) * 0x70)
#define HW_APBHX_CHn_SEMA(n) \
        (((dma_is_apbh() && apbh_is_old()) ? 0x080 : 0x140) + (n) * 0x70)

Do you mean apbh_is_old represents the same as SoC type and can be replaced
by mxs_dma_type?

 >  #define HW_APBX_VERSION				0x800
quoted
 #define BP_APBHX_VERSION_MAJOR			24
 #define HW_APBHX_CHn_NXTCMDAR(n) \
@@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ struct mxs_dma_chan {
 #define MXS_DMA_CHANNELS_MASK		0xffff
 
 struct mxs_dma_engine {
-	int				dev_id;
+	unsigned int			type;
+	unsigned int			dev_id;
 	unsigned int			version;
 	void __iomem			*base;
 	struct clk			*clk;
@@ -130,6 +132,74 @@ struct mxs_dma_engine {
 	struct mxs_dma_chan		mxs_chans[MXS_DMA_CHANNELS];
 };
 
+enum mxs_dma_devtype {
+	IMX23_DMA,
+	IMX28_DMA,
+};
+
+struct mxs_dma_type {
+	unsigned int type;
+	unsigned int id;
+};
+
+static struct mxs_dma_type mxs_dma_types[] = {
+	{
+		.type = IMX23_DMA,
+		.id = MXS_DMA_APBH,
To me, IMX23_DMA is more like a id, while MXS_DMA_APBH is more like
a type.
Well, i'm more like IMX23_DMA since they're different devices.
Id to me is more like a same device but different id.
And you see i already have enum mxs_dma_devtype.
quoted
+	}, {
+		.type = IMX23_DMA,
+		.id = MXS_DMA_APBX,
+	}, {
+		.type = IMX28_DMA,
+		.id = MXS_DMA_APBH,
+	}, {
+		.type = IMX28_DMA,
+		.id = MXS_DMA_APBX,
+	}, {
+		/* end of list */
+	}
This end sign is not needed, I think.
Ok to me.
btw i always had this question before,
Can you tell what's purpose of adding a '/* end of list */'?
quoted
+};
+
+static struct platform_device_id mxs_dma_idt[] = {
s/mxs_dma_idt/mxs_dma_ids?
Ok to me.
quoted
+	{
+		.name = "imx23-dma-apbh",
+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &mxs_dma_types[0],
+	}, {
+		.name = "imx23-dma-apbx",
+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &mxs_dma_types[1],
+	}, {
+		.name = "imx28-dma-apbh",
+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &mxs_dma_types[2],
+	}, {
+		.name = "imx28-dma-apbx",
+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t) &mxs_dma_types[3],
+	}, {
+		/* end of list */
+	}
+};
+
+static struct mxs_dma_chan *to_mxs_dma_chan(struct dma_chan *chan)
+{
+	return container_of(chan, struct mxs_dma_chan, chan);
+}
+
+int mxs_dma_is_apbh(struct dma_chan *chan)
+{
+	struct mxs_dma_chan *mxs_chan = to_mxs_dma_chan(chan);
+	struct mxs_dma_engine *mxs_dma = mxs_chan->mxs_dma;
+
+	return dma_is_apbh();
I would expect it simply be

	return (mxs_dma->dev_id == MXS_DMA_APBH);

And dma_is_apbh() can be removed completely now.
Yes, it's ture.
Basically what i did in this patch is only convert the driver to
a more generic platform_device_id, seems i need to do more...
quoted
+}
+
+int mxs_dma_is_apbx(struct dma_chan *chan)
+{
+	struct mxs_dma_chan *mxs_chan = to_mxs_dma_chan(chan);
+	struct mxs_dma_engine *mxs_dma = mxs_chan->mxs_dma;
+
+	return !dma_is_apbh();
	return (mxs_dma->dev_id == MXS_DMA_APBX);
quoted
+}
+
+
 static void mxs_dma_reset_chan(struct mxs_dma_chan *mxs_chan)
 {
 	struct mxs_dma_engine *mxs_dma = mxs_chan->mxs_dma;
@@ -193,11 +263,6 @@ static void mxs_dma_resume_chan(struct mxs_dma_chan *mxs_chan)
 	mxs_chan->status = DMA_IN_PROGRESS;
 }
 
-static struct mxs_dma_chan *to_mxs_dma_chan(struct dma_chan *chan)
-{
-	return container_of(chan, struct mxs_dma_chan, chan);
-}
-
 static dma_cookie_t mxs_dma_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
 {
 	struct mxs_dma_chan *mxs_chan = to_mxs_dma_chan(tx->chan);
@@ -574,11 +639,18 @@ static int __init mxs_dma_init(struct mxs_dma_engine *mxs_dma)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_out;
 
-	/* only major version matters */
-	mxs_dma->version = readl(mxs_dma->base +
+	if (mxs_dma->type == IMX23_DMA) {
+		/* only major version matters */
+		mxs_dma->version = readl(mxs_dma->base +
 				((mxs_dma->dev_id == MXS_DMA_APBX) ?
-				HW_APBX_VERSION : HW_APBH_VERSION)) >>
+				HW_APBX_VERSION : HW_APBH_VERSION_IMX23)) >>
 				BP_APBHX_VERSION_MAJOR;
+	} else if (mxs_dma->type == IMX28_DMA) {
+		mxs_dma->version = readl(mxs_dma->base +
+				((mxs_dma->dev_id == MXS_DMA_APBX) ?
+				HW_APBX_VERSION : HW_APBH_VERSION_IMX28)) >>
+				BP_APBHX_VERSION_MAJOR;
+	}
Again, let's just get rid of the use of VERSION completely.
quoted
 
 	/* enable apbh burst */
 	if (dma_is_apbh()) {
@@ -601,6 +673,8 @@ static int __init mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct platform_device_id *id_entry =
 				platform_get_device_id(pdev);
+	const struct mxs_dma_type *mtype =
+			(struct mxs_dma_type *)id_entry->driver_data;
 	struct mxs_dma_engine *mxs_dma;
 	struct resource *iores;
 	int ret, i;
@@ -609,7 +683,8 @@ static int __init mxs_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!mxs_dma)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	mxs_dma->dev_id = id_entry->driver_data;
+	mxs_dma->type = mtype->type;
+	mxs_dma->dev_id = mtype->id;
 
 	iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 
@@ -692,23 +767,11 @@ err_request_region:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static struct platform_device_id mxs_dma_type[] = {
-	{
-		.name = "mxs-dma-apbh",
-		.driver_data = MXS_DMA_APBH,
-	}, {
-		.name = "mxs-dma-apbx",
-		.driver_data = MXS_DMA_APBX,
-	}, {
-		/* end of list */
-	}
-};
-
 static struct platform_driver mxs_dma_driver = {
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "mxs-dma",
 	},
-	.id_table	= mxs_dma_type,
+	.id_table	= mxs_dma_idt,
 };
 
 static int __init mxs_dma_module_init(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/fsl/mxs-dma.h b/include/linux/fsl/mxs-dma.h
index 203d7c4..55d8702 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsl/mxs-dma.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsl/mxs-dma.h
@@ -15,14 +15,6 @@ struct mxs_dma_data {
 	int chan_irq;
 };
 
-static inline int mxs_dma_is_apbh(struct dma_chan *chan)
-{
-	return !strcmp(dev_name(chan->device->dev), "mxs-dma-apbh");
-}
-
-static inline int mxs_dma_is_apbx(struct dma_chan *chan)
-{
-	return !strcmp(dev_name(chan->device->dev), "mxs-dma-apbx");
-}
-
+extern int mxs_dma_is_apbh(struct dma_chan *chan);
+extern int mxs_dma_is_apbx(struct dma_chan *chan);
I would expect these two calls still be inline here.
Ok to me.

Regards
Dong Aisheng
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help