[PATCH v6 17/17] pwm: Take over maintainership of the PWM subsystem

* Thierry Reding wrote:

* Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Thursday 12 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

  * Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday 10 April 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

I'm taking over the maintainership of the PWM subsystem. This commit
also adds the URLs to the gitorious project and repository as well as
any missing files related to the PWM subsystem.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
Note: I guess this patch in particular could use some Acked-by, maybe from
Arnd and Sascha so that people will know this happens with their blessing.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

As far as I can tell the series is in pretty good shape. I've integrated
Shawn's latest comments and I think we could get this into 3.5. Does it make
sense to take the PWM tree through Linux next before having it pulled into
mainline during the next merge window?

Yes, that's the way to go. Just ask Stephen Rothwell to include it right
away if you are sufficiently happy with the contents and believe that they
don't break stuff.

I just saw that there's been some discussion to remove IS_ENABLED() and
replace it by something else. So maybe I should wait another day or two
until those changes settle in next.

Seems like this issue is resolved, but something else came up. In the !OF
builds, of_pwm_request() no longer builds because of_property_match_string()
and of_parse_phandle_with_args() have no dummies for !OF. I've posted patches
for these on Friday and they need to go in before the PWM subsystem. I could
also revert the IS_ENABLED() parts and go back to a #ifdef CONFIG_OF but I'd
rather not.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120416/36702ea1/attachment-0001.sig>