[PATCH 2/2] regulator: rename function regulator_register_fixed
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-31 13:45:16
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-31 13:45:16
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:54:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:25:08AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
There's no harm in using it for regulators that physically exist if nothing cares about any of the information it can't provide
I do not think it's practical for physical regulator to use the function, since the function forces microvolts to be 0.
Yeah, but it depends if anyone actually cares what the voltage is - most consumers never look to see what the voltage is because they have no reason to care. The lack of naming is more of an issue really. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120331/fd870d51/attachment.sig>