On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Linus,
quoted
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
? ? ? case WDIOC_GETTIMELEFT:
? ? ? ? ? ? ? clk_enable(clk);
? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Read repeatedly until the value is stable! */
I was wondering if it pays to put this IOCTL to watchdog_dev and add another
callback to watchdog_ops? I'd think so. Wim, Linus, what do you think?
OK with me, shall I hack a patch?
I think Viresh did something allready.
OK I rebased on top of Viresh's patch and sent them both out since
I don't know the status of his patch.
If you already have Viresh's patch in your tree just applying 2/2
should work as fine.
Yours,
Linus Walleij