[GIT PULL] cpufreq: OMAP updates for v3.4
From: Kevin Hilman <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-15 14:25:43
Also in:
linux-omap
Grazvydas Ignotas [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Grazvydas Ignotas [off-list ref] writes: [...]quoted
quoted
Russell King (1): ? ? ?cpufreq: OMAP driver depends CPUfreq tablesIt seems this one got messed up, it says "default ARCH_OMAP2PLUS" instead of depends.That was intentional. ?What do you think is messed up about it? It's the same as saying: ? ? depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS ? ? default yHm, somehow I've never encountered this syntax, but it more looks like it means "default y if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS" instead of that. Checked this with menuconfig now: default ARCH_OMAP2PLUS resolves to: ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ [=y] && CPU_FREQ [=y] && ARM [=y] ..which might cause build break when OMAP is not selected, and depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS default y resolves to: ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ [=y] && CPU_FREQ [=y] && ARM [=y] && ARCH_OMAP2PLUS [=y] ..which should be randconfig friendly.
Yeah, you're right. Feel free to send a patch using your comments above to describe that the current form is not randconfig friendly. Kevin