Conflict between Versatile Express DT conversion and local timer updates
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-13 15:00:26
On 13/03/12 14:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 13/03/12 11:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Tuesday 13 March 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 13/03/12 10:15, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
quoted
d) create a new next/timer branch in arm-soc that has Pawel's 98ed4ceb "ARM: vexpress: Get rid of MMIO_P2V" (the first patch from vexpress/dt, your patches and the ux500/timer series. Also put 98ed4ceb into the next/cleanup branch. Any of those will work for us, my preference would be on #4. I have created the next/timer branch in the arm-soc tree, so you can use that and either rebase your patches on top or merge your tree into it and fix up the merge conflicts.Thanks for doing that Arnd. I've thus created a new branch: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git local_timers-for-arm-soc which contains the arm-soc next/timers branch as well as my local timers series. I'd greatly appreciate if you could pull it for 3.4.I've updated the next/timer branch with your changes now, but did not put it into the for-next branch because Olof is currently handling that. Olof, can you add it to for-next please? The timer branch should have no dependencies other than rmk/for-armsoc, so it can be fairly close to the start.
Thank you very much guys. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...