Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-03-15

[PATCH v2] ARM: SPEAr600: Add device-tree support to SPEAr600 boards

From: Viresh Kumar <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-15 08:19:54
Also in: linux-devicetree

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your patch. :)

I have looked carefully at the patch, regarding addresses and irq numbers,
and they look fine. Just few minor comments below:

On 3/14/2012 8:30 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
quoted hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/spear600.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/spear600.dtsi
quoted hunk
+       soc {
+               #address-cells = <1>;
+               #size-cells = <1>;
+               compatible = "simple-bus";
+               ranges;
+
+
+               gmac0: ethernet at e0800000 {
There is no gmac1, so can name it gmac only.
quoted hunk
+                       compatible = "st,spear600-gmac";
+                       reg = <0xe0800000 0x8000>;
+                       interrupt-parent = <&vic1>;
+                       interrupts = <24 23>;
+                       interrupt-names = "macirq", "eth_wake_irq";
+                       mac-address = [000000000000]; /* Filled in by U-Boot */
+               };
+
+               fsmc0: flash at d1800000 {
same.
quoted hunk
+                       status = "disabled";
+                       compatible = "st,spear600-fsmc-nand";
+                       #address-cells = <1>;
+                       #size-cells = <1>;
+                       reg = <0xd1800000 0x1000        /* FSMC Register */
+                              0xd2000000 0x4000>;      /* NAND Base */
+                       reg-names = "fsmc_regs", "nand_data";
+               };
+
+               smi0: flash at fc000000 {
same
quoted hunk
+                       status = "disabled";
+                       compatible = "st,spear600-smi";
+                       #address-cells = <1>;
+                       #size-cells = <1>;
+                       reg = <0xfc000000 0x1000>;
+                       interrupt-parent = <&vic1>;
+                       interrupts = <12>;
+               };
+
quoted hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear600_evb.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear600_evb.c
index c6e4254..c4949aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear600_evb.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear600_evb.c
@@ -32,9 +32,6 @@ static void __init spear600_evb_init(void)
 {
        unsigned int i;
Why don't we remove the devices from arrays above, which are now
supported by DT?
quoted hunk
-       /* call spear600 machine init function */
-       spear600_init();
-
        /* Add Platform Devices */
        platform_add_devices(plat_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(plat_devs));
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear6xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear6xx/spear6xx.c
quoted hunk
+static const struct of_device_id vic_of_match[] __initconst = {
+       { .compatible = "arm,pl190-vic", .data = vic_of_init, },
+       { /* Sentinel */ }
+};
+
+static void __init spear6xx_dt_init_irq(void)
+{
+       of_irq_init(vic_of_match);
+}
+
Did you checked this out?

-- 
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help