[RFC PATCH] of: DMA helpers: manage generic requests specification
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-14 18:16:16
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-14 18:16:16
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap
On 03/14/2012 11:47 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: ...
I do have the will to avoid the treats of memory corruption in case of malformed DT data, as Stephen was saying. But, on the other hand I do not know really if this can happen: if the .xlate() function which is provided by the DMA controller is well written, it should check for proper args_count or maximum string size. I do not have the feeling that adding an enum will enforce the security here. Do you know a way to enforce security of this "void *" parameter or the check of number of cells + the due diligence of .xlate() function writers will be enough?
I guess if the only source of the data is a driver's of_xlate function, and it's only being passed back to that same driver and never interpreted elsewhere, then its probably reasonable to assume that's enough for safety.