* Stephen Warren wrote:

Thierry Reding wrote at Wednesday, February 22, 2012 8:17 AM:

quoted

PWM clock source registers in Tegra 2 have different clock source selection bit
fields than other registers.  PWM clock source bits in CLK_SOURCE_PWM_0 register
are located at bit field bit[30:28] while others are at bit field bit[31:30] in
their respective clock source register.

This patch updates the clock programming to correctly reflect that, by adding a
flag to indicate the alternate bit field format and checking for it when
selecting a clock source (parent clock).

tegra30_clocks.c needs this change too, although on Tegra30, it's bits
29:28 for the PWM, and bits 31:30 for non-PWM.

Okay, I'll add code for Tegra30 in the next version. I won't be able to test
that at all because I don't have any Tegra30 hardware.

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_clocks.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_clocks.c

+#define PERIPH_CLK_SOURCE_4BIT_MASK	(7<<28)
+#define PERIPH_CLK_SOURCE_4BIT_SHIFT	28

Why is this (and the flag that enables it) called "4 bit"; the existing
code supports a 2-bit mux field (4-values), whereas this new code supports
a 3-bit field (potentially 8 values, but only 5 actually assigned).
Can this be renamed something more accurate, especially since on Tegra30
the difference is only the bit position of the field, not the number of
bits in the field.

This is taken directly from the Chromium tree, so I don't really know why
that name was chosen. But since the PWM clock source register seems to be the
only exception, how about calling the flag PWM_CLK and prefix the shift and
mask with PWM_CLK_SOURCE_ instead?

quoted

@@ -908,9 +910,16 @@ static void tegra2_periph_clk_init(struct clk *c)
 	u32 val = clk_readl(c->reg);
 	const struct clk_mux_sel *mux = NULL;
 	const struct clk_mux_sel *sel;
+	u32 shift;
+
+	if (c->flags & PERIPH_SOURCE_CLK_4BIT)
+		shift = PERIPH_CLK_SOURCE_4BIT_SHIFT;
+	else
+		shift = PERIPH_CLK_SOURCE_SHIFT;

I think you should assign a "mask" variable here too...

quoted

+
 	if (c->flags & MUX) {
 		for (sel = c->inputs; sel->input != NULL; sel++) {
-			if (val >> PERIPH_CLK_SOURCE_SHIFT == sel->value)
+			if (val >> shift == sel->value)
 				mux = sel;

Because in the new case, bit 31 isn't part of the field, so just
shifting doesn't isolate the mux field. In practice, this probably isn't
an issue since bit 31 is undefined, but better to be safe than sorry...

Okay, I'll fix that as well.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120303/d7a69d55/attachment.sig>