[PATCHv7 9/9] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-06 23:22:03
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-iommu, linux-mm, linux-samsung-soc
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:04:22PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
+static int arm_iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
+ struct dma_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ struct arm_vmregion *c;
+
+ vma->vm_page_prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, vma->vm_page_prot);
+ c = arm_vmregion_find(&consistent_head, (unsigned long)cpu_addr);What protects this against other insertions/removals from the list?
+
+ if (c) {
+ struct page **pages = c->priv;
+
+ unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
+ unsigned long usize = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ do {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, pages[i++]);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Remapping memory, error: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
+ usize -= PAGE_SIZE;
+ } while (usize > 0);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * free a page as defined by the above mapping.
+ * Must not be called with IRQs disabled.
+ */
+void arm_iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
+ dma_addr_t handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ struct arm_vmregion *c;
+ size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+
+ c = arm_vmregion_find(&consistent_head, (unsigned long)cpu_addr);What protects this against other insertions/removals from the list?
+ if (c) {
+ struct page **pages = c->priv;
+ __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
+ __iommu_remove_mapping(dev, handle, size);
+ __iommu_free_buffer(dev, pages, size);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Map a part of the scatter-gather list into contiguous io address space
+ */
+static int __map_sg_chunk(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+ size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
+ enum dma_data_direction dir)
+{
+ struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = dev->archdata.mapping;
+ dma_addr_t iova, iova_base;
+ int ret = 0;
+ unsigned int count;
+ struct scatterlist *s;
+
+ size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+ *handle = ARM_DMA_ERROR;
+
+ iova_base = iova = __alloc_iova(mapping, size);
+ if (iova == ARM_DMA_ERROR)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (count = 0, s = sg; count < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); s = sg_next(s))
+ {
+ phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(sg_page(s));
+ unsigned int len = PAGE_ALIGN(s->offset + s->length);
+
+ if (!arch_is_coherent())
+ __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(sg_page(s), s->offset, s->length, dir);
+
+ ret = iommu_map(mapping->domain, iova, phys, len, 0);Dealing with phys addresses on one part and pages + offset + length in a different part doesn't look like a good idea. Why can't there be some consistency?