[PATCH v1 1/5] ARM: imx28: add basic dt support
From: Lothar Waßmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-19 16:49:31
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, lkml
Hi, Grant Likely writes:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:54:33 +0100, Lothar Wa?mann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Grant Likely writes:quoted
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:01:35 +0800, Dong Aisheng [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:22:04PM +0800, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:quoted
Dong Aisheng writes:quoted
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:53:29PM +0800, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:Anyway there is no definite spec how the MAC address(es) are stored in the fuse map. Thus reading the MAC from there is more or less platform specific.It's just provide one more option since there are customers storing the MAC in the fuse map.That should be straight forward to support; have a property that specifies the method used for fetching/calculating the MAC.Executable code stored inside a DT blob? ;)I know you're joking here, but I'm going to answer seriously anyway... Absolutely not. What I'm suggesting is a property that specifies the method used to determine the mac address. Something like (off the top of my head): local-mac-address = [01 02 03 00 00 00]; local-mac-mask = [0xff 0xff 0xff 0 0 0]; mac-encoding = "append-serial-number";
That still does not specify where the remaining part of the MAC is stored and how it should be retrieved.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Currently I'm setting up the MAC address for our TX28 from the fuses in the platform code passed via platform_data, but that will obviously not work with DT.Non-dt can also use my proposal, then you only need to pass the fixed part of MAC via platfrom data, the left will be read by fec driver.quoted
The correct way would probably be to pass the MAC from the bootloader via a DT blob. But that would require all bootloaders to be updated first to support DTS. :(But uboot will face the same problem that can not define a valid MAC in dts, did i undertand correctly?quoted
An intermediate solution could be using OF_DEV_AUXDATA to pass a platform_data struct that may contain a MAC address set up by the platform code.Yes, it's a way but i'm afraid will not get accepted by dt people.The problem remains; where does the platform code get the MAC address from? The kernel has to devise it from *somewhere* and the best place for that should be in the MAC driver itself.The platform code knows how and where the MAC is stored on a specific platform. The driver has no business in knowing platform details like this. Thus only platform code (or the bootloader) can provide the MAC to the driver.Okay, if so then it would be wise to have a reliable function for the MAC driver to call to lookup it's address as determined by platform code. Alternately, the platform code can write the correct mac address into the device tree node at init time (see prom_update_property() and prom_add_property()).
That sounds good. Didn't know about those functions. That could be used to mimic the current behaviour of supplying the MAC via platform_data. Lothar Wa?mann -- ___________________________________________________________ Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996 www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de ___________________________________________________________