On Sunday 11 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig

@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
 config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
      bool
 
+config AT91_HAS_PATA
+     bool

what is the need for this?

As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT

When I originally wrote the patch, I was hitting build errors when trying
to enable the at91 pata driver on socs that don't have the right declarations
in their headers. If that has been resolved in a better way already, this
patch can be dropped.

	Arnd