[PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: OMAP2+: Split omap2_hsmmc_init() to properly support I2C GPIO pins
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2012-02-23 18:47:51
Also in:
linux-omap
* Igor Grinberg [off-list ref] [120223 05:56]:
quoted
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c@@ -411,9 +411,9 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = { { .mmc = 1, .caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA, - .gpio_cd = -EINVAL, + .gpio_cd = OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES + 0, .gpio_wp = -EINVAL,
I don't have these changes, in my second revision of the patch. It's best not to hardcode the values here.
quoted
- + .deferred = true, }, { .mmc = 2,@@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = { .gpio_cd = -EINVAL, .gpio_wp = -EINVAL, .ocr_mask = 0x00100000, /* 3.3V */ + .deferred = true,Why do you defer this one? It does not use external GPIO chip, in fact it does not use CD/WP at all.
Why do you have the following then to set gpio_cd?
quoted
}, {} /* Terminator */ };@@ -469,9 +470,7 @@ static int cm_t35_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio, pr_err("CM-T35: could not obtain gpio for WiFi reset\n"); } - /* gpio + 0 is "mmc0_cd" (input/IRQ) */ - mmc[0].gpio_cd = gpio + 0; - omap2_hsmmc_init(mmc); + omap_hsmmc_deferred_add(mmc); return 0; }
Hmm I don't have omap_hsmmc_deferred_add() in my second version of the patch either. Rajendra, please do the patches on that, now it's impossible to see what else you've changed. That's the version posted here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg64884.html
quoted
@@ -639,6 +638,7 @@ static void __init cm_t3x_common_init(void) omap_serial_init(); omap_sdrc_init(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params, mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params); + omap_hsmmc_init(mmc); cm_t35_init_i2c(); omap_ads7846_init(1, CM_T35_GPIO_PENDOWN, 0, NULL); cm_t35_init_ethernet();Other then the comment above, looks fine. I will probably be able to test this on Sunday.
OK
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c index a59ace0..11a6aa4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c@@ -293,8 +293,9 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = { { .mmc = 1, .caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA, - .gpio_cd = -EINVAL, + .gpio_cd = OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES + 0, .gpio_wp = -EINVAL, + .deferred = true, }, #if defined(CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO) || defined(CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO_MODULE) {@@ -302,6 +303,7 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = { .caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA, .gpio_cd = -EINVAL, .gpio_wp = -EINVAL, + .deferred = true,same here, why defer it?
Because it too sets gpio_cd in the callback.
ditto
ditto, that too sets gpio_cd..
quoted
}, #endif {} /* Terminator */@@ -360,10 +362,8 @@ static int omap3evm_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev, { int r, lcd_bl_en; - /* gpio + 0 is "mmc0_cd" (input/IRQ) */ omap_mux_init_gpio(63, OMAP_PIN_INPUT); - mmc[0].gpio_cd = gpio + 0;
..here. Same for the others. So maybe check is some are wrong? Tony