On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:43:54PM +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Rajendra Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -324,8 +302,8 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_reg_get(struct omap_hsmmc_host
*host)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask = ocr_value;
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?} else {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (!(mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask & ocr_value)) {
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pr_err("MMC%d ocrmask %x is not
supported\n",
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? host->id,
mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask);
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pr_err("MMC ocrmask %x is not
supported\n",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? mmc_slot(host).ocr_mask);
You're dropping the MMC number from these error messages. It would be
much better to fix them instead. Use dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "blah"
rather than pr_err().
Drivers should not be using pr_* unless they really do not have a struct
device.