[PATCH 0/2] Errata workaround updates

On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Will Deacon wrote:

Hello,

After Russell pointed out that we weren't applying an erratum workaround
in all cases that it was required:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/082730.html

I went back through the documents for PL310 and Cortex-A9 to check that
what we have in Linux matches the latest workarounds.

Ideally, you should not limit the workaround only to those revisions 
known to be broken but to any revision.  Only when a particular revision 
is known to be fixed then should it be disabled.


Nicolas