Michal,

2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz [off-list ref]:

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

2012/2/23 Marek Szyprowski [off-list ref]:

quoted

This is (yet another) quick update of CMA patches. I've rebased them
onto next-20120222 tree from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git and
fixed the bug pointed by Aaro Koskinen.

For the whole series:

Tested-by: Barry Song <redacted>

and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA:

Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or
similar)?

i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed
in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA
to users who want to use cma. i also think we should have a seperate
document to explain cma in details in documents/, and my helper
program can be placed there.

how do you think?

--
Best regards, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? _ ? ? _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of ? ? ?o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, ?Micha? ?mina86? Nazarewicz ? ?(o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--

thanks
barry