Common clock API for i.MX
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 15:52:02
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:42:20AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
I do think that this is a big part of the issue, the patches have been floating around for ages and it's not clear when they'll manage to make it in (and hence when it'll be worth moving to use them).
Maybe because nobody is actively promoting them and pushing them forward? It is not sufficient to just post patches to a mailing list and wait.
Yeah, it's a chicken and egg situation - it seems very difficult for them to get integrated so few people are spending much time on them which means it's not obvious that there's a pressing need for them :( -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120125/3677c32e/attachment.sig>