[PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented
From: Shubhrajyoti <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 08:52:28
Also in:
linux-omap
From: Shubhrajyoti <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 08:52:28
Also in:
linux-omap
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 01:39 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
Hi, On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Shubhrajyoti D [off-list ref] wrote: ...quoted
include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h index 1a81fde..c717bb6 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h@@ -427,9 +427,9 @@ static inline int mtd_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) static inline int mtd_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd) { - if (!mtd->suspend) - return -EOPNOTSUPP; - return mtd->suspend(mtd); + if (mtd->suspend) + return mtd->suspend(mtd); + return 0; } static inline void mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)I believe this fix is already accounted for in Artem Bityutskiy's l2-mtd-2.6 repository as: commit 091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574 mtd: fix MTD suspend (http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git/commit/091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574) However, the bug made it into the 3.3 merge window, so shouldn't this bugfix be sent upstream immediately?
OK thanks for pointing that.
Brian