On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Shubhrajyoti wrote:

On Tuesday 10 January 2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:

quoted

"Datta, Shubhrajyoti" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Datta, Shubhrajyoti
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Shubhrajyoti [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Friday 16 December 2011 02:10 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:

quoted

This patch either needs to be acked by Ben with a note that it's okay for
us to merge through the OMAP tree, or needs to be merged by Ben during the
3.4 merge window, after patches 1-3 have reached the mainline tree.

I agree.
Ben do you have any comments .

If there are no further comments can this be merged also ?

As Benoit mentioned earlier, the addition of new pdata fields will cause
problems with the DT support already queued for v3.3.

This series should be reworked on top of the DT support which Ben has
now queued for v3.3 (my branch: for_3.3/i2c/misc)

Yes will rework it.

Depending on what you plan to do, you'll probably need to coordinate this 
with Tony also.  He's already pulled some of the patches from this series 
into his i2c branch.

The real question is how you plan to handle the device reset function, 
given that the driver should compile on a non-OMAP build (meaning that you 
can't call omap_device*() functions from the driver directly), nor should 
the driver touch the SYSCONFIG register directly.


- Paul