Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2012-01-03

Renaming MACH_TYPE_KINETIS_K60 into MACH_TYPE_KINETIS

From: Alexander Potashev <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-03 11:21:03

Hi Russell,

On 3 ?????? 2012 11:03:37 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I notice that you sent me a very similar email on 24th December, which I
haven't responded to yet: given that it's the Christmas period, and
people take holidays, I think you're being a little hasty over your
resending.
The reason why I have re-sent the message to the mailing list was that I 
feeled like this discussion should be public, not just that I was bored 
waiting for the response.

Anyway, sorry for the noise.
In any case, yes, I can change it.  However, as has already been
pointed out, we're moving over to using device tree as the primary form
of platform differentiation.  With device tree, machine type numbers
are completely meaningless (and aren't actually used by the kernel.)
Thanks in advance for fixing the entry!
While I will fix the entry, I suspect that Arnd will now refuse to
merge any new SoC support for mainline which is not using the device
tree.
Linux kernel development in our company is still based on the 2.6.33 version 
of the kernel. Most of our code is not going to be sent upstream. We will 
probably think about FDT when upgrading to a newer version of the kernel.


-- 
Regards,
Alexander
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help