On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:35:54AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 07:29:32PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:00AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
quoted
@@ -53,6 +59,10 @@ void __init fpga_irq_init(int parent_irq, u32
valid, struct fpga_irq_data *f)
f->chip.irq_ack = fpga_irq_mask;
f->chip.irq_mask = fpga_irq_mask;
f->chip.irq_unmask = fpga_irq_unmask;
+ f->domain.irq_base = f->irq_start;
+ f->domain.nr_irq = 32;
+ f->domain.ops = &irq_domain_simple_ops;
+ irq_domain_add(&f->domain);
if (parent_irq != -1) {
irq_set_handler_data(parent_irq, f);@@ -70,3 +80,40 @@ void __init fpga_irq_init(int parent_irq, u32 valid, struct fpga_irq_data *f)
}
}
}
There is a loop in fpga_irq_init() that sets up all the irqs, but with
the introduction of the full irq_domain, that can be moved out to the
.map irq_domain ops function. The irq_domain will call it to set up
each irq when it is requested.
That's not quite working for me - I have the following .map() function:
static int sic_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
struct fpga_irq_data *f = d->host_data;
irq_set_chip_data(virq, f);
irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &f->chip, handle_level_irq);
set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
return 0;
}
but when irq_domain_add_legacy() iterates over the irq's I haven't had
chance to set the host_data. The patch below works for me, not sure
what you think.
Let me look at it a bit. You can leave the initialization loop in
fpga_irq_init() for now. I'm looking at adding a mask field to
irq_domain_add_legacy in addition to the host_data pointer. I also
want to investigate replacing fpga_irq with generic-chip.c. The
problem I've currently got though is that irq_domain_add_legacy() can
currently support any number of irqs, but adding a simple mask
argument will limit it to 32. That won't work for large irq
controllers like the gic.
g.