Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2012-01-13

[PATCH v2 4/5] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add interrupt-controller bindings for INTC

From: Hiremath, Vaibhav <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-13 12:31:31
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 16:33:07, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,

On 1/13/2012 7:14 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 19:09:57, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
@@ -54,10 +54,12 @@
  		ranges;
  		ti,hwmods = "l3_main";

-		intc: interrupt-controller at 1 {
-			compatible = "ti,omap3-intc";
+		intc: interrupt-controller at 48200000 {
+			compatible = "ti,omap2-intc";
  			interrupt-controller;
  			#interrupt-cells =<1>;
+			ti,intc-size =<96>;
Can we configure/change this field in platform specific .dts file?
OR
Is there condition based configuration possible in DT?
I'm not sure to fully understand how your two options differ.
Otherwise, yes the DT it can be configured, that why I exposed this 
attribute.
The intc code was already supporting the ti81xx with 128 lines as well, 
hence the need to make it configurable.
I wanted to use DT configuration completely here, using existing
omap_init_irq.
And I personally think, lets not use different implementation only because
number of interrupts are different.
The other option was two handle that in the driver with 2 different 
compatible strings.
quoted
To be specific,

I am adding support for AM335x EVM (using all your DT support patches),
The device is considered as OMAP3 variant and when it comes to INTC support,
I need to configure it to value "128", rest everything is same
(including base add).

Can I do something like

File - am335x-evm.dts

/include/ "omap3.dtsi"

....
Again change the specific fields of " intc: interrupt-controller"?
Yes.
quoted
....

How can this be handled?
After the include, you can redefine the node and the hierarchy:

+	ocp {
+		intc: interrupt-controller at 48200000 {
+			ti,intc-size = <128>;
+		};
...

or use the label directly:

+&intc: {
+	ti,intc-size =<128>;
+}

You can have a look at the way i2c or twl are using the include so far.
Thanks, I will trying this now...
And if it works, then I can submit the patches...


Thanks,
Vaibhav
Regards,
Benoit
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help