On 01/25/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

On 01/20/2012 09:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano
[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

Hi Colin,

this patchset could be interesting to resolve in a generic way the cpu
dependencies.
What is the status of this patchset ?

I can't do much with it right now, because I don't have any devices
that can do SMP idle with a v3.2 kernel.  I've started working on an
updated version that avoids the spinlock, but it might be a while
before I can test and post it.  I'm mostly looking for feedback on the
approach taken in this patch, and whether it will be useful for other
SoCs besides Tegra and OMAP4.

Hi Colin,

I will be happy to test your patchset. Do you have a pointer to a more 
recent kernel ?

Hi Colin,

sorry for bothering you. I am working on a cpuidle driver for an ARM SMP 
board, I will be really happy to test your patchset and look how it fits 
with the cpuidle driver.

Thanks
   -- Daniel