Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 6 authors, 2012-01-26

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: IOMMU: Tegra30: Add iommu_ops for SMMU driver

From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
Date: 2012-01-23 15:43:13
Also in: linux-iommu, linux-tegra, lkml

Hi,

please see my comments inline. When you fix these issues I think the
driver is ready for merging.

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:11:49AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
+static int smmu_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
+			  phys_addr_t pa, size_t bytes, int prot)
+{
+	struct smmu_as *as = domain->priv;
+	unsigned long pfn = __phys_to_pfn(pa);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	dev_dbg(as->smmu->dev, "[%d] %08lx:%08x\n", as->asid, iova, pa);
+
+	if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, flags);
+	__smmu_iommu_map_pfn(as, iova, pfn);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, flags);
+	return 0;
Why do you completly ignore the size parameter in this function (and
in the unmap part below)?
According to the page-sizes you export to the generic layer size can be
4k or 4M. You need to take care of that in this function.
+static void smmu_iommu_domain_destroy(struct iommu_domain *domain)
+{
+	struct smmu_as *as = domain->priv;
+	struct smmu_device *smmu = as->smmu;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, flags);
+
+	if (as->pdir_page) {
+		spin_lock(&smmu->lock);
+		smmu_write(smmu, SMMU_PTB_ASID_CUR(as->asid), SMMU_PTB_ASID);
+		smmu_write(smmu, SMMU_PTB_DATA_RESET_VAL, SMMU_PTB_DATA);
+		FLUSH_SMMU_REGS(smmu);
+		spin_unlock(&smmu->lock);
+
+		free_pdir(as);
+	}
+
+	if (!list_empty(&as->client)) {
+		struct smmu_client *c;
+
+		list_for_each_entry(c, &as->client, list)
+			dev_err(smmu->dev,
+				"%s is still attached\n", dev_name(c->dev));
This is not an error. Just detach the devices when they are still
attached to the domain.
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, flags);
+
+	domain->priv = NULL;
+	dev_dbg(smmu->dev, "smmu_as@%p\n", as);
+}
+
+static int smmu_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+				 struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct smmu_as *as = domain->priv;
+	struct smmu_device *smmu = as->smmu;
Hmm, this looks like there is a 1-1 mapping between hardware SMMU
devices and domains. This is not consistent with IOMMU-API semantics
where a domain can contain devices behind different SMMUs. Please fix
that.


Thanks,

	Joerg
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help