Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2012-01-07

linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree

From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-07 05:38:11
Also in: linux-next, lkml

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c between commit 9bdd46257ab3 ("ARM: plat-mxc:
hook special idle handlers to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and commit
010dc8af8f28 ("ARM: mx5: use generic irq chip pm interface for pm
functions on") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Hi Stephen,

When I was testing this fix on next-20120106, I spotted another compile
error from this file.

  CC      arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.o
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:58:24: error: redefinition of ?mx50_io_desc?
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:48:24: note: previous definition of ?mx50_io_desc? was here
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:48:24: warning: ?mx50_io_desc? defined but not used

The fix could just be removing the duplication.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn


8<----
@@ -53,16 +54,6 @@ static struct map_desc mx50_io_desc[] __initdata = {
 };

 /*
- * Define the MX50 memory map.
- */
-static struct map_desc mx50_io_desc[] __initdata = {
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, TZIC, MT_DEVICE),
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, SPBA0, MT_DEVICE),
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, AIPS1, MT_DEVICE),
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, AIPS2, MT_DEVICE),
-};
-
-/*
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help