Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2011-12-18
STALE5299d
Revisions (11)
  1. v3 [diff vs current]
  2. v3 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v3 [diff vs current]
  5. v4 [diff vs current]
  6. v4 [diff vs current]
  7. v4 [diff vs current]
  8. v4 [diff vs current]
  9. v4 current
  10. v5 [diff vs current]
  11. v4 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: SMP: Refactor Kconfig to be more maintainable

From: David Brown <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-14 17:46:18

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:36:55AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:11:37PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 05:56:30PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
quoted
Making SMP depend on (huge list of MACH_ and ARCH_ configs) is
bothersome to maintain and likely to lead to merge conflicts.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
index ebde97f..e6beaff 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ config MSM_SOC_REV_A
 	bool
 config  ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
 	bool
+	select HAVE_SMP
 
 config  ARCH_MSM_ARM11
 	bool
The ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP config's only purpose was to enable SMP higher
up.  We might as well eliminate ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP entirely, and just
select HAVE_SMP in ARCH_MSM8X60 and ARCH_MSM8960.
First and foremost, I'm just refactoring with this series.  I've
included other trivial changes suggested by other people where the
effect is clear and straightforward.
In that light, your patch is probably the right approach.  I can clean
our stuff up and sent out other patches later.

Thanks,
David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help