[PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: pl2x0/pl310: Refactor Kconfig to be more maintainable
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-12 22:22:48
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:53:23PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:04:37PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 03:01:58PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:08:37PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:47:05AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig index 724ec0f..c4c9acf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ choice config ARCH_EXYNOS4 bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4" + select CACHE_L2X0Doesn't this need to select HAVE_L2X0_L2CC as well?Probably not -- due to a moment of madness, it looks like I somehow mistranslated "highbank" as "exynos4".Well, you have CACHE_L2X0 depending on HAVE_L2X0_L2CC. Selecting CACHE_L2X0 without HAVE_L2X0_L2CC being selected will make Kconfig produce a message about unmet dependencies. The other solution to this is: config CACHE_L2X0 bool "Enable the L2x0 outer cache controller" if HAVE_L2X0_L2CC and I think that's more in keeping with what Rob mentioned in his message - it makes this a non-user selectable option unless HAVE_L2X0_L2CC is enabled. However, in this case it would be more sensible to name the option 'MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0'. (btw, please name the option after the option it relates to.)We still want CACHE_L2X0 to default to y even in the MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 case, since it is not usually desirable to turn it off except for debugging purposes. Would the correct thing be: config CACHE_L2X0 bool "Enable the L2x0 outer cache controller" if MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 default MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 That way, select CACHE_L2X0=y, MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0=y and both=y will all produce sensible results, if I understand correctly how this works. ...or is there a better way?
I think that's a good compromise (and improvement).