Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2011-12-02

backlight/ld9040.c: regulator control in the lcd driver

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-02 10:05:43
Also in: linux-fbdev

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Kyungmin Park [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[leedonghwa]
[Me]
quoted
quoted
+ ? ? ? ? lcd->reg_vdd3 = regulator_get(lcd->dev, "vdd");
+ ? ? ? ? if (IS_ERR(lcd->reg_vdd3)) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_info(lcd->dev, "no %s regulator found\n", "vdd");
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? lcd->reg_vdd3 = NULL;
+ ? ? ? ? }
+
+ ? ? ? ? lcd->reg_vci = regulator_get(lcd->dev, "vci");
+ ? ? ? ? if (IS_ERR(lcd->reg_vci)) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_info(lcd->dev, "no %s regulator found\n", "vci");
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? lcd->reg_vci = NULL;
+ ? ? ? ? }
As explained in earlier discussion with Mark regarding the SMSC911x
driver regulator, treat these as errors and do not fail
"gracefully" like this.

Reference:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131914562120725&w=2
As mentioned at commit message, the lcd regulator is optional part and
refer the mmc codes

? ? ? ?host->vmmc = regulator_get(mmc_dev(mmc), "vmmc");
? ? ? ?if (IS_ERR(host->vmmc)) {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pr_info("%s: no vmmc regulator found\n", mmc_hostname(mmc));
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?host->vmmc = NULL;
? ? ? ?} else {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?regulator_enable(host->vmmc);
? ? ? ?}

Previous time, these codes are located at board file, but more boards
are used, it has same codes for all boards. so move it to drivers.
I know. This was brought up in the aforementioned discussion,
but the above is also wrong, simply. See:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131914562120667&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131914562120690&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131914562120725&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131963332527416&w=2
In our case, it has the regulator but some boards don't.

Umm then how to handle the regulator gracefully?
Mark suggest using a fixed-voltage regulator for boards
where the power is always on. The voltage level itself
is optional. See:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131963332527416&w=2

Other approaches is to use dummy regulators, or not
call regulator_has_full_constraints(), which means the
regulator core will provide dummy regulators anyways.
See:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131973043527112&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=131975178703166&w=2

Whole thread of discussion:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&w=2&r=1&s=smsc911x&q=b

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help