On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:24:05AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:

quoted

Have you tried to pass this param from kernel cmdline?  What's the
syntax if we want to pass a 800 MHz max_freq?

clk-reg-cpufreq.max_freq=800000

Thanks.  I was mistaken on the module name.

quoted

### cpufreq_05:
### test 'ondemand' and 'conservative' trigger correctly the configuration directory
### https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#cpufreq_05
###
cpufreq_05.0: checking 'ondemand' directory exists...                       pass
cpufreq_05.1: checking 'conservative' directory exists...                   pass
cpufreq_05.2: checking 'ondemand' directory is not there...                 pass
cpufreq_05.3: checking 'conservative' directory is not there...             pass
cpufreq_05.4: checking 'ondemand' directory exists...                       fail
cpufreq_05.5: checking 'conservative' directory exists...                   pass

I past fail part script here:
    switch_ondemand cpu0
    switch_conservative cpu1
    check "'ondemand' directory exists" "test -d $CPU_PATH/cpufreq/ondemand"
    check "'conservative' directory exists" "test -d $CPU_PATH/cpufreq/conservative"
This driver assume all cpu cores to share the same freq and voltage. The affected
cpu is all other cpus. They also share one single governor. The test case does not
suit this driver and not for most arm multi-core cpus I guess.

Then this is the feedback that Linaro PMWG wants to have, I guess.

Here is my tag on this patch.

Acked-by: Shawn Guo <redacted>

-- 
Regards,
Shawn