flatmem broken for nommu? [Was: Re: does non-continuous RAM means I need to select the sparse memory model?]
From: Stefan Hellermann <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-01 16:10:28
Also in:
linux-mm
Am 01.12.2011 16:39, schrieb Uwe Kleine-K?nig:
Hello, On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:57:18AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:39:10PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:quoted
2011/11/29 Uwe Kleine-K?nig [off-list ref]:quoted
Hello, I'm currently working on a new arch port and my current machine has RAM at 0x10000000 and 0x80000000. So there is a big hole between the two banks. When selecting the sparse memory model it works, but when selecting flat the machine runs into a BUG in mark_bootmem() called by free_unused_memmap() to free the space between the two banks.My understanding is that you have to select ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL.I think that is not necessary.quoted
quoted
Is that expected (meaning I cannot use the flat model)? I currently don't have another machine handy that has >1 memory back to test that.In case you have access to a MX35PDK you can try on this board as it does have the memory hole.No I havn't, but I just used a 128MB machine and changed that in the .fixup callback to 64MB + 32MB with a 32MB hole in between and it works fine without ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL. I debugged the problem a bit further and one symptom is that struct page *mem_map is NULL for me. That looks wrong. I guess this is just broken for nommu. I will dig into that later today.The problem is that the memory for mem_map is allocated using: map = alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(pgdat, size); without any error checking. The _nopanic was introduced by commit 8f389a99 (mm: use alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() on really needed path) I don't understand the commit's log and don't really see why it should be allowed to not panic if the allocation failes here but use a NULL pointer instead. I put the people involved in 8f389a99 on Cc, maybe someone can comment? Apart from that it seems I cannot use flatmem as is on my machine. It has only 128kiB at 0x10000000 + 1MiB at 0x80000000 and needs 14MiB to hold the table of "struct page"s. :-( Best regards Uwe
The commit was made after an bug report from me. I have an old x86 tablet pc with only 8Mb Ram. This machine fails early on bootup without this commit. I found an archived message of the bug report here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1135909 Regards, Stefan