Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-11-04

[PATCH v2 2/2] USB: ehci-tegra: add probing through device tree

From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-04 19:23:33
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-tegra

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Olof Johansson [off-list ref] wrote:
Rely on platform_data being passed through auxdata for now; more elaborate
bindings for phy config and tunings to be added.

v2: moved vbus-gpio check to the helper function, added check for !of_node,
? ?added usb2 clock to board-dt table.

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <redacted>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted>
quoted hunk
---
?arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c | ? ?9 +++++
?drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c ?| ? 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
?2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
index 74743ad..7f287a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
@@ -61,12 +61,21 @@ struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
? ? ? ?OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-i2s", TEGRA_I2S1_BASE, "tegra-i2s.0", NULL),
? ? ? ?OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-i2s", TEGRA_I2S1_BASE, "tegra-i2s.1", NULL),
? ? ? ?OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-das", TEGRA_APB_MISC_DAS_BASE, "tegra-das", NULL),
+ ? ? ? OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", TEGRA_USB_BASE, "tegra-ehci.0",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&tegra_ehci1_device.dev.platform_data),
+ ? ? ? OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", TEGRA_USB2_BASE, "tegra-ehci.1",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&tegra_ehci2_device.dev.platform_data),
+ ? ? ? OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", TEGRA_USB3_BASE, "tegra-ehci.2",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&tegra_ehci3_device.dev.platform_data),
? ? ? ?{}
?};

?static __initdata struct tegra_clk_init_table tegra_dt_clk_init_table[] = {
? ? ? ?/* name ? ? ? ? parent ? ? ? ? ?rate ? ? ? ? ? ?enabled */
? ? ? ?{ "uartd", ? ? ?"pll_p", ? ? ? ?216000000, ? ? ?true },
+ ? ? ? { "usbd", ? ? ? "clk_m", ? ? ? ?12000000, ? ? ? false },
+ ? ? ? { "usb2", ? ? ? "clk_m", ? ? ? ?12000000, ? ? ? false },
+ ? ? ? { "usb3", ? ? ? "clk_m", ? ? ? ?12000000, ? ? ? false },
? ? ? ?{ NULL, ? ? ? ? NULL, ? ? ? ? ? 0, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0},
?};
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
index db9d1b4..dbc7fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
@@ -21,7 +21,12 @@
?#include <linux/platform_data/tegra_usb.h>
?#include <linux/irq.h>
?#include <linux/usb/otg.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
+
?#include <mach/usb_phy.h>
+#include <mach/iomap.h>

?#define TEGRA_USB_DMA_ALIGN 32
@@ -574,6 +579,35 @@ static const struct hc_driver tegra_ehci_hc_driver = {
? ? ? ?.port_handed_over ? ? ? = ehci_port_handed_over,
?};

+static int setup_vbus_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ ? ? ? int err = 0;
+ ? ? ? int gpio;
+
+ ? ? ? if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0;
+
+ ? ? ? gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvidia,vbus-gpio", 0);
+ ? ? ? if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0;
+
+ ? ? ? err = gpio_request(gpio, "vbus_gpio");
+ ? ? ? if (err) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't request vbus gpio %d", gpio);
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return err;
+ ? ? ? }
+ ? ? ? err = gpio_direction_output(gpio, 1);
+ ? ? ? if (err) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't enable vbus\n");
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return err;
+ ? ? ? }
+ ? ? ? gpio_set_value(gpio, 1);
+
+ ? ? ? return err;
+}
+
+static u64 tegra_ehci_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+
?static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
?{
? ? ? ?struct resource *res;
@@ -590,6 +624,15 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -EINVAL;
? ? ? ?}

+ ? ? ? /* Right now device-tree probed devices don't get dma_mask set.
+ ? ? ? ?* Since shared usb code relies on it, set it here for now.
+ ? ? ? ?* Once we have dma capability bindings this can go away.
+ ? ? ? ?*/
+ ? ? ? if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pdev->dev.dma_mask = &tegra_ehci_dma_mask;
+
+ ? ? ? setup_vbus_gpio(pdev);
+
? ? ? ?tegra = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tegra_ehci_hcd), GFP_KERNEL);
? ? ? ?if (!tegra)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -ENOMEM;
@@ -640,6 +683,28 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?goto fail_io;
? ? ? ?}

+ ? ? ? /* This is pretty ugly and needs to be fixed when we do only
+ ? ? ? ?* device-tree probing. Old code relies on the platform_device
+ ? ? ? ?* numbering that we lack for device-tree-instantiated devices.
+ ? ? ? ?*/
+ ? ? ? if (instance < 0) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? switch (res->start) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? case TEGRA_USB_BASE:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? instance = 0;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? case TEGRA_USB2_BASE:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? instance = 1;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? case TEGRA_USB3_BASE:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? instance = 2;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? default:
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? err = -ENODEV;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unknown usb instance\n");
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto fail_phy;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
+ ? ? ? }
+
? ? ? ?tegra->phy = tegra_usb_phy_open(instance, hcd->regs, pdata->phy_config,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?TEGRA_USB_PHY_MODE_HOST);
? ? ? ?if (IS_ERR(tegra->phy)) {
@@ -773,6 +838,11 @@ static void tegra_ehci_hcd_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hcd->driver->shutdown(hcd);
?}

+static struct of_device_id tegra_ehci_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
+ ? ? ? { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-ehci", },
+ ? ? ? { },
+};
+
?static struct platform_driver tegra_ehci_driver = {
? ? ? ?.probe ? ? ? ? ?= tegra_ehci_probe,
? ? ? ?.remove ? ? ? ? = tegra_ehci_remove,
@@ -783,5 +853,6 @@ static struct platform_driver tegra_ehci_driver = {
? ? ? ?.shutdown ? ? ? = tegra_ehci_hcd_shutdown,
? ? ? ?.driver ? ? ? ? = {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?.name ? = "tegra-ehci",
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .of_match_table = tegra_ehci_of_match,
? ? ? ?}
?};
--
1.7.4.1


-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help