Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2011-11-07

[PATCH v4 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-04 20:28:46
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:54:24PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The helper routine is meant to be used by the regulator drivers
to extract the regulator_init_data structure from the data
that is passed from device tree.
'consumer_supplies' which is part of regulator_init_data is not extracted
as the regulator consumer mappings are passed through DT differently,
implemented in subsequent patches.
Similarly the regulator<-->parent/supply mapping is handled in
subsequent patches.

Also add documentation for regulator bindings to be used to pass
regulator_init_data struct information from device tree.

Some of the regulator properties which are linux and board specific,
are left out since its not clear if they can
be in someway embedded into the kernel or passed in from DT.
They will be revisited later.

Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <redacted>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt    |   33 ++++++++
 drivers/regulator/Kconfig                          |    7 ++
 drivers/regulator/Makefile                         |    1 +
 drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c                   |   81 ++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/regulator/of_regulator.h             |   20 +++++
 5 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/regulator/of_regulator.h
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c488bf3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Voltage/Current Regulators
+
There should be a mandatory compatible field here, right? I.e. a topmost
generic one, "regulator" or similar.
+Optional properties:
+- regulator-name: A string used as a descriptive name for regulator outputs
Ah, there it is. Ignore my previous comment then, Mark. :)
+- regulator-min-uV: smallest voltage consumers may set
+- regulator-max-uV: largest voltage consumers may set
+- regulator-uV-offset: Offset applied to voltages to compensate for voltage drops
+- regulator-min-uA: smallest current consumers may set
+- regulator-max-uA: largest current consumers may set
+- regulator-always-on: boolean, regulator should never be disabled
+- regulator-boot-on: bootloader/firmware enabled regulator
Once you have a compatible field that can determine what kind of device node,
and binding, this is, you can drop the regulator- prefix and save some space in
the device tree. Properties are rarely prefixed by their subsystem. Only
exception would/could be the regulator-name property where it could make
sense to keep the prefix.

Also, lower-caps is common instead of V and A.
+- <name>-supply: phandle to the parent supply/regulator node
Having a fixed name here instead of a free form string would probably be a good
idea?



-Olof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help