[PATCH v7 21/21] OMAP2+: UART: Do not gate uart clocks if used for debug_prints
From: Govindraj <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-20 08:39:22
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-serial
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Govindraj, On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 18:22:58, Govindraj wrote:quoted
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Govindraj, On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 21:05:41, R, Govindraj wrote:quoted
If OMAP UART is used as console uart and debug is enabled, avoid gating of uart clocks to print all debug prints.: :quoted
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? console_uart_id = uart->num; + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cmdline_find_option("debug")) { + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? uart_debug = true;Shouldn't "loglevel" also be checked?Might not be necessary, loglevel only sets the option in console driver how a printk should be handled from vprintk so any printk should be to sent to console or to syslogd action where it will be buffered to a file(var/log/messages). Any print's with any log level should be handled and printed to console. consider below path below path uart->ops ?-> runtime_get_sync ? ? ? -> omap_device_enable ? ? ? ? ? -> clock_enable All the prints in given path are dev_dbgs for which we need debug to be set from command line argument. As stated in change log any dev_dbg prints from these path can be redirect to uart->ops so even before our clock was enabled we got redirected back to uart code. So for dev_dbg prints from above path we need debug to be set from command-line and we can prevent uart clock gating to this scenario.Isn't passing bootargs "loglevel=10" same as "debug"? (init/main.c)
Yes correct, I missed that part here is the updated patch [1] Updated change-log for debug/loglevel and checked console_loglevel in addition to debug in bootargs. Same is updated in the branch hosted for v7_runtime: https://gitorious.org/runtime_3-0/runtime_3-0/commit/3775d72f1205d218eb423a83ed87afe4c643ef38 git://gitorious.org/runtime_3-0/runtime_3-0.git v7_rc9_uart_runtime -- Thanks, Govindraj.R [1]: