[PATCH v4 06/10] ARM: SoC: convert Exynos4 to SoC descriptor

On 04/10/11 14:16, Kukjin Kim wrote:

Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

Convert Exynos4 to use the SoC descriptor to provide its SMP
and CPU hotplug operations.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/core.h                |    9 +++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c                 |    8 ++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/hotplug.c             |    8 +++++---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-armlex4210.c     |    3 +++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-nuri.c           |    3 +++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c         |    3 +++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdk4212.c       |    3 +++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c       |    4 ++++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-universal_c210.c |    3 +++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/platsmp.c             |   25
+++++++++++++++++++++----
 10 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/core.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/core.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/core.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba9fcc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/core.h

Is there any reason to add core.h in mach-exynos4 not
mach-exynos4/include/mach?

No particular reason. If you prefer having that file in include/mach,
I'll move it, though I don't think it makes much more sense.

quoted

+
+struct arm_soc_desc exynos4_soc_desc __initdata = {
+	.name		= "Samsung Exynos4",

If you're ok, I preferred 'Samsung EXYNOS4'

No problem.

And could you please re-work this based on latest my for-next because there
are updated board file.

Where is your for-next branch located these days? When it gets picked up
by linux-next, I'll update the board files. As of next-20111004, I seem
to cover them all.

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...