[PATCH v4 0/7] add initial imx6q support
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-03 02:40:31
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:04:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
This patch series adds the initial support for imx6q, which is a Cortex-A9 Quad Core based SoC. We chose to add imx6q support into mach-imx other than mach-mx5 or a new mach-mx6, because we intend to merge mach-mx5 into mach-imx, so that we have only mach-imx for imx family. It's based on linux-next-20110926 with some prerequisite patches not showing up on linux-next applied.How should we best proceed on this series? Sascha, do you want to take the next version into your tree once Shawn has addressed the remaining comments, or should I just take the patches with your Ack? Shawn, what are the current dependencies? I will have to pull in the other branches that this depends on into the next/soc tree and then wait for those to get merged first before I send this to Linus.
Thanks for asking, Arnd.
The latest version (v5) of this series that I will send shortly has
the dependencies on the following branches.
* rmk's for-next branch with the following additional patches wait for
rmk to apply:
- ARM: l2x0: add empty l2x0_of_init (Rob Herring)
- ARM: cache-l2x0: add resume entry for l2 in secure mode (Barry Song)
- ARM: localtimer: add header linux/errno.h explicitly (Shawn Guo)
- ARM: smp: Add an IPI handler callable from C code (Marc Zyngier)
- ARM: smp: Add a localtimer handler callable from C code (Shawn Guo)
* Rob Herring's "GIC OF bindings" series, currently on
git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
tglx has picked up the two that are irq core related. And I'm not
sure about the branch that Rob will push others to.
* Branches that will be merged into arm-soc
- Sascha's imx-cleanup
- Sascha's imx-features
- [GIT PULL] DEBUG_LL platform updates for 3.2 (Will Deacon)
--
Regards,
Shawn