[PATCH 3/3] arm/dt: tegra: add dts file for paz00
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-26 06:43:06
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-tegra
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-11-01 · [PATCH 3/3] arm/dt: tegra: add dts file for paz00 · Stephen Warren <hidden>
- 2011-11-01 · [PATCH 3/3] arm/dt: tegra: add dts file for paz00 · marvin24@gmx.de (Marc Dietrich)
- 2011-10-31 · [PATCH 3/3] arm/dt: tegra: add dts file for paz00 · marvin24@gmx.de (Marc Dietrich)
- 2011-10-31 · [PATCH 3/3] arm/dt: tegra: add dts file for paz00 · Stephen Warren <hidden>
- 2011-10-31 · [PATCH 3/3] arm/dt: tegra: add dts file for paz00 · marvin24@gmx.de (Marc Dietrich)
Marc Dietrich wrote at Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:05 PM:
On Monday 24 October 2011 22:16:15 Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
Marc Dietrich wrote at Saturday, October 22, 2011 2:17 PM:quoted
* NOT FOR COMMIT * This just adds the dts for paz00. I like to add it to board-dt as well as soon as I find out which tree to base it on....quoted
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-paz00.dtsOne thing that cross my mind when writing the TrimSlice support and I forgot to mention: Should these files be named ${soc}-${board}.dts or ${vendor}-${board}.dts (tegra-paz00.dts or toshiba-paz00.dts or compal-paz00.dts). I'm OK either way; just want to follow any outside expectations.I also don't know. I prefer compal for paz00 because Toshiba's code name was procyon (I think) and I don't want to change all the naming. Also Toshiba showed no interest in helping us, so I don't see why they should get the fame.
Well, it's more about correctly defining what the HW is than advertising, fame, or support! -- nvpublic