On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:22:19AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:

* Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] [111020 09:31]:

quoted

That's where a DT entry specific configuration string might be the best
option as it still allows describing the hardware using DT standards,
while also allowing board specific configuration too.

Hmm, actually, can't we just pass the board specific configuration in
the board specific .dts file and then it gets merged in with the
arch independent DT node?

It would be fine to, say, have a omap-specific board configuration
node for collecting things that really don't fit anywhere else.  That
would be in some ways analogous to the way we've decided to use top a
top level node for describing a machines audio complex.

g.