Hi Mike,
Some random comments/nits ...
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:56PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
+struct clk *clk_register(const struct clk_hw_ops *ops, struct clk_hw *hw,
+ const char *name)
+{
+ struct clk *clk;
+
+ clk = kzalloc(sizeof(*clk), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!clk)
+ return NULL;
+
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&clk->children);
+ INIT_HLIST_NODE(&clk->child_node);
+
The children and child_node are introduced in patch #2, and should not
be used in patch #1.
+ clk->name = name;
+ clk->ops = ops;
+ clk->hw = hw;
+ hw->clk = clk;
+
+ /* Query the hardware for parent and initial rate */
+
+ if (clk->ops->get_parent)
+ /* We don't to lock against prepare/enable here, as
+ * the clock is not yet accessible from anywhere */
/*
* Multiple line comments
*/
+ clk->parent = clk->ops->get_parent(clk->hw);
+
+ if (clk->ops->recalc_rate)
+ clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw);
+
+
One blank line is good enough.
+ return clk;
+}
--
Regards,
Shawn