Thread (36 messages) read the whole thread 36 messages, 4 authors, 2011-10-17

[PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes as supported by the hardware

From: Roedel, Joerg <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-17 09:29:15
Also in: kvm, linux-omap, lkml

Hi Ohad,

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 04:05:02AM -0400, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
quoted
This whole thing is quite marginal though and also very easy to change
later, so we can start with the "driver-provided io_page_size"
approach for now.
Sorry, I just couldn't get myself to sign-off this as it really feels
wrong to me.

This min_pagesz member is just cached by the core so it doesn't need to
look it up every time we're mapping. Drivers shouldn't care about it, as it's
completely internal to the iommu core. I'm afraid that pushing this to
the drivers
feels like redundant duplication of code and might also confuse developers.

Let me please suggest two alternatives:
a) drop this min_pagesz cache completely. iommu core would then redundantly
  re-calculate this every time something is mapped, but I hardly believe there
  is going to be a measurable impact on performance.
b) keep the current implementation for now, and fix this later (when we constify
  struct iommu_ops *) by caching min_pagesz in a dynamically allocated iommu
  context. Since this future "constify" patch will anyway need to change 'struct
  bus_type', it would be a good opportunity to do this change at the same time.

I don't mind which of those approaches to take, and I also don't mind doing (b)
myself later, in a separate patch. Your call.
I think option a) is the best. It should add only minimal overhead to
the iommu_map path.
quoted
quoted
This needs to be (left > 0). The drivers are allowed to unmap more then
requested, so this value may turn negative.
Good point. 'left' is size_t though, so i'll fix this a bit differently.
Fixed, please take a look:
quoted
From 00b8b9373fe2d73da0280ac1e6ade4a701c95140 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <redacted>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:50:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes as supported
by the hardware

When mapping a memory region, split it to page sizes as supported
by the iommu hardware. Always prefer bigger pages, when possible,
in order to reduce the TLB pressure.

The logic to do that is now added to the IOMMU core, so neither the iommu
drivers themselves nor users of the IOMMU API have to duplicate it.

This allows a more lenient granularity of mappings; traditionally the
IOMMU API took 'order' (of a page) as a mapping size, and directly let
the low level iommu drivers handle the mapping, but now that the IOMMU
core can split arbitrary memory regions into pages, we can remove this
limitation, so users don't have to split those regions by themselves.

Currently the supported page sizes are advertised once and they then
remain static. That works well for OMAP and MSM but it would probably
not fly well with intel's hardware, where the page size capabilities
seem to have the potential to be different between several DMA
remapping devices.

register_iommu() currently sets a default pgsize behavior, so we can convert
the IOMMU drivers in subsequent patches. After all the drivers
are converted, the temporary default settings will be removed.

Mainline users of the IOMMU API (kvm and omap-iovmm) are adopted
to deal with bytes instead of page order.

Many thanks to Joerg Roedel [off-list ref] for significant review!

Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <redacted>
Cc: David Brown <redacted>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <redacted>
Cc: Stepan Moskovchenko <redacted>
Cc: KyongHo Cho <redacted>
Cc: Hiroshi DOYU <redacted>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c      |  124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/iommu/omap-iovmm.c |   17 ++----
 include/linux/iommu.h      |   24 +++++++-
 virt/kvm/iommu.c           |    8 ++--
 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
The patch looks good now. Please implement option a) and it should be
fine. I will test it on an AMD IOMMU platform. We still need someone to
test it on VT-d.

	Joerg

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help