Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2011-10-10

[PATCH v7 3/3] arm/tegra: device tree support for ventana board

From: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver)
Date: 2011-10-10 08:01:32
Also in: linux-tegra, lkml

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:04:34PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
Peter De Schrijver wrote at Monday, October 03, 2011 7:19 AM:

...
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-ventana.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-ventana.dts
...
quoted
+	chosen {
+		bootargs = "vmalloc=192M video=tegrafb console=ttyS0,115200n8 root=/dev/ram rdinit=/sbin/init";
It might be nice to make this identical to what Harmony and Seaboard have here.

Still, it doesn't matter a lot, since I (and I imagine most people) have
to edit this command-line to point at the correct partition for my disks
anyway; eventually, U-Boot should be providing/re-writing this property
too.

...
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
...
quoted
-	if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,harmony"))
-		harmony_pinmux_init();
-	else if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,seaboard"))
-		seaboard_pinmux_init();
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinmux_configs); i++) {
+		if (of_machine_is_compatible(pinmux_configs[i].machine)) {
+			pinmux_configs[i].init();
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(pinmux_configs))
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Unknown platform! Pinmuxing not initialized\n");
Should that be WARN() instead of printk?
pr_warning() might be better. Or do we want a backtrace and a tainted kernel
in this case? 

Cheers,

Peter.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help