[PATCH v7 3/3] arm/tegra: device tree support for ventana board
From: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver)
Date: 2011-10-10 08:01:32
Also in:
linux-tegra, lkml
From: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver)
Date: 2011-10-10 08:01:32
Also in:
linux-tegra, lkml
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:04:34PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
Peter De Schrijver wrote at Monday, October 03, 2011 7:19 AM: ...quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-ventana.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-ventana.dts...quoted
+ chosen { + bootargs = "vmalloc=192M video=tegrafb console=ttyS0,115200n8 root=/dev/ram rdinit=/sbin/init";It might be nice to make this identical to what Harmony and Seaboard have here. Still, it doesn't matter a lot, since I (and I imagine most people) have to edit this command-line to point at the correct partition for my disks anyway; eventually, U-Boot should be providing/re-writing this property too. ...quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c...quoted
- if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,harmony")) - harmony_pinmux_init(); - else if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,seaboard")) - seaboard_pinmux_init(); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pinmux_configs); i++) { + if (of_machine_is_compatible(pinmux_configs[i].machine)) { + pinmux_configs[i].init(); + break; + } + } + + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(pinmux_configs)) + printk(KERN_WARNING "Unknown platform! Pinmuxing not initialized\n");Should that be WARN() instead of printk?
pr_warning() might be better. Or do we want a backtrace and a tainted kernel in this case? Cheers, Peter.