On 10/4/2011 9:54 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Kevin Hilman[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

The approach is OK with me, but I'm a bit torn about whether or not to
merge this since the need for this should go away when converting to DT.

I guess it will still take some time until our boards are fully
functional with DT, so I think we should regard this as an interim
solution. Without this patch, a huge deal of code consolidation and
generalization is gated (namely - generic iommu and dma api, and
everything that depends on it, e.g. rpmsg/remoteproc).

quoted

Is anyone working on IOMMU DT description?

Unless Benoit is, I'll happily pick this up.

Cool, a volunteer... You're in.

Thanks,
Benoit