Ohad Ben-Cohen [off-list ref] writes:

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The approach is OK with me, but I'm a bit torn about whether or not to
merge this since the need for this should go away when converting to DT.

I guess it will still take some time until our boards are fully
functional with DT, so I think we should regard this as an interim
solution. Without this patch, a huge deal of code consolidation and
generalization is gated (namely - generic iommu and dma api, and
everything that depends on it, e.g. rpmsg/remoteproc).

quoted

Is anyone working on IOMMU DT description?

Unless Benoit is, I'll happily pick this up.

tag.  you're it.

quoted

I guess if I do merge this, we can also clean this up significantly
after all devices are converted to DT.

Sure.

OK, as long as I have some confidence that this is going in the right
direction (and having you on the job is a good sign!)  I'm willing to
merge something like this as an interim solution.

Kevin

quoted

Unless it has other dependencies on Benoit's further DT patches, you can
base this on my for_3.2/omap_device-2 branch which includes Benoit's
alloc changes.

Ok, thanks a lot !
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/