Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] writes:

* Benoit Cousson [off-list ref] [110927 09:45]:

quoted

Most devices are using the same default omap_device_pm_latency structure
during device built. In order to avoid the duplication of the same
structure everywhere, add a default structure that will be used if
the device does not have an explicit one.

Next patches will clean the duplicated structures.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <redacted>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <redacted>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
---
 arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
index f832f92..cd8d977 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c

@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@
 static int omap_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
 static int omap_early_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
 
+static struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_default_latency[] = {
+	{
+		.deactivate_func = omap_device_idle_hwmods,
+		.activate_func   = omap_device_enable_hwmods,
+		.flags = OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST,
+	}
+};
+
 /* Private functions */

Isn't this racey between devices if the latency values get adjusted
automatically for each device?

A copy of this is made for each device (uses kmemdup later in the patch.)

Kevin