Hello Arnd,

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:28:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

We've talked about it before, but I don't remember the outcome. Can you
explain (and add to the above text) a short explanation of why this is
in the mach-imx directory, rather than the mach-mx5 (which probably is
closer to mx6 than mx3 is) or a new mach-mx6?

Not having looked into the patches yet, but I think mach-imx is the
right choice. The longterm plan for mach-mx5 is to be folded into
mach-imx, too. We just didn't found a volunteer for that.

Best regards
Uwe

BTW, are you on irc somewhere?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |