Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2011-09-05
DORMANTno replies

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix mask for S3C64xx CPU IDs

From: Kukjin Kim <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-05 10:20:40

Mark Brown wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The difference in CPU ID between S3C6400 and S3C6410 is a single bit and
that bit wasn't included in the mask causing the S3C6410 to be misdetected
as a S3C6400.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-
samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
index aa1f69b..4d36130 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ extern unsigned long samsung_cpu_id;
 #define S3C6400_CPU_ID		0x36400000
 #define S3C6410_CPU_ID		0x36410000
 #define S3C64XX_CPU_ID		(S3C6400_CPU_ID &
S3C6410_CPU_ID)
-#define S3C64XX_CPU_MASK	0x1FF40000
+#define S3C64XX_CPU_MASK	0x1FFF0000

 #define S5P6440_CPU_ID		0x56440000
 #define S5P6450_CPU_ID		0x36450000
--
1.7.5.4
Oops, I don't know how it has wrong value :(
I think, in this case, it's better 0xFFFFF000 rather than 0x1FFF0000.

If any problems, please let me know.

Will apply, thanks :)

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help