On 16:18 Tue 30 Aug     , ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

drop the cpu_is in the driver
at91sam9261 and at91sam9g10 expect 3 clocks

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <redacted>
---
?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c ? ?| ? ?2 ++
?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c ?| ? ?2 ++
?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c | ? ?2 ++
?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c | ? 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | ? ?2 ++
?arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | ? ?2 ++
?drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c ? ? | ? 15 +++++----------
?7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
index bfc6844..ecdd54d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c

@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {

? ? ? ?CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("t0_clk", "atmel_tcb.0", &tcb_clk),
? ? ? ?CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.0", &ssc0_clk),
? ? ? ?CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.1", &ssc1_clk),
+ ? ? ? /* fake hclk clock */

why is it a fake clock??

because we do have the hclk only on 9261 and 9g10

Best Regards,
J.