[RFC PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock: OMAP4: Add spinlock support in DT
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-08 08:11:35
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-09-12 · Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock: OMAP4: Add spinlock support in DT · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
- 2011-09-11 · Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock: OMAP4: Add spinlock support in DT · Ohad Ben-Cohen <hidden>
- 2011-09-09 · Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock: OMAP4: Add spinlock support in DT · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
- 2011-09-08 · Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock: OMAP4: Add spinlock support in DT · Ohad Ben-Cohen <hidden>
- 2011-09-08 · Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] hwspinlock: OMAP4: Add spinlock support in DT · Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Cousson, Benoit [off-list ref] wrote:
The (small) issue for my point of view is that the #hwspinlock is already encoded in the IP itself. So adding a baseid directly in DT will look like duplicating indirectly something that is already there in the HW. That being said, since we cannot rely on the order, we will not be able to get the proper baseid until the driver probe every hwspinlock devices :-( So baseid might be a easier choice.
Sounds good. Thanks a lot !