On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:30:11PM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:01:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
Well, with DT, there won't be any 'board type' anymore. There won't be
any 'machine_is_xxx()' to sort it out anymore. Using DT, all that will
be history - it's all got to be sorted out by either devices or device
properties.
There is a board type - there's a root compatible property for the board
which fulfils this purpose - so the situation with and without device
tree is essentially the same.
So instead of a table of machine id numbers and soc device strings, you're
going to have a table of board 'compatible' strings and soc device strings,
and you're going to have to manually create the struct device with that
name.
That's just twisted and utterly insane - adding more code for precisely
zero benefit what so ever. Think about it - the device tree is *already*
creating platform devices for entries in the device tree file. What's
the point of having this special ASoC code look up the platform compatible
property in a table of strings to find a different string to manually
create a device with. Why not just _add_ the bloody device to the DT
file in the first place? That's partly what DT is there for - to create
platform specific struct devices.