[PATCH 09/24] C6X: signal management

On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:50 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:

quoted

+segv_and_exit:
+     force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+     return -EFAULT;
+}

Shouldn't that really be a call to force_sigsegv(signr, current) ?

Yes, I think so. Thanks.

--Mark