[PATCH 2/2] video: s3c-fb: Modify s3c-fb driver to support window positioning
From: Ajay kumar <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-26 05:21:50
Also in:
linux-fbdev, linux-samsung-soc
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-08-25 · [PATCH 2/2] video: s3c-fb: Modify s3c-fb driver to support window positioning · Ajay Kumar <hidden>
Hi Jingoo, 2011/8/26 JinGoo Han [off-list ref]:
Hi, Ajay.quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Ajay Kumar [mailto:ajaykumar.rs at samsung.com] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 4:52 AM To: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-fbdev at vger.kernel.org; linux- arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Cc: FlorianSchandinat at gmx.de; lethal at linux-sh.org; jg1.han at samsung.com; m.szyprowski at samsung.com; ben-linux at fluff.org; banajit.g at samsung.com Subject: [PATCH 2/2] video: s3c-fb: Modify s3c-fb driver to support window positioning This patch modifies the existing s3c-fb driver to provide flexibility to the user to reposition the framebuffer windows. Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <redacted> Signed-off-by: Banajit Goswami <redacted> --- ?drivers/video/s3c-fb.c | ? 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- ?1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c index 0fda252..41179d7 100644 --- a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c +++ b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ static int s3c_fb_set_par(struct fb_info *info)? ? ? struct fb_var_screeninfo *var = &info->var; ? ? ? struct s3c_fb_win *win = info->par; ? ? ? struct s3c_fb *sfb = win->parent; + ? ? struct s3cfb_window_pos *winpos = &win->windata->winpos; ? ? ? void __iomem *regs = sfb->regs; ? ? ? void __iomem *buf = regs; ? ? ? int win_no = win->index;@@ -539,12 +540,13 @@ static int s3c_fb_set_par(struct fb_info *info)? ? ? /* write 'OSD' registers to control position of framebuffer */ - ? ? data = VIDOSDxA_TOPLEFT_X(0) | VIDOSDxA_TOPLEFT_Y(0); + ? ? data = VIDOSDxA_TOPLEFT_X(winpos->win_pos_x) | + ? ? ? ? ? ?VIDOSDxA_TOPLEFT_Y(winpos->win_pos_y); ? ? ? writel(data, regs + VIDOSD_A(win_no, sfb->variant)); - ? ? data = VIDOSDxB_BOTRIGHT_X(s3c_fb_align_word(var->bits_per_pixel, - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?var->xres - 1)) | - ? ? ? ? ? ?VIDOSDxB_BOTRIGHT_Y(var->yres - 1); + ? ? data = VIDOSDxB_BOTRIGHT_X((s3c_fb_align_word(var->bits_per_pixel, + ? ? ? ? ? ?(winpos->win_pos_x + var->xres - 1)))) | + ? ? ? ? ? ?VIDOSDxB_BOTRIGHT_Y((winpos->win_pos_y + var->yres - 1)); ? ? ? writel(data, regs + VIDOSD_B(win_no, sfb->variant));@@ -999,8 +1001,10 @@ static int s3c_fb_ioctl(struct fb_info *info,unsigned int cmd, ?{ ? ? ? struct s3c_fb_win *win = info->par; ? ? ? struct s3c_fb *sfb = win->parent; - ? ? int ret; + ? ? struct s3cfb_window_pos *winpos = &win->windata->winpos; + ? ? int ret = 0; ? ? ? u32 crtc; + ? ? u32 data; ? ? ? switch (cmd) { ? ? ? case FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC:@@ -1011,6 +1015,29 @@ static int s3c_fb_ioctl(struct fb_info *info,unsigned int cmd, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = s3c_fb_wait_for_vsync(sfb, crtc); ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; + ? ? case S3CFB_WIN_POSITION: + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (copy_from_user(winpos, (u32 __user *)arg, + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sizeof(struct s3cfb_window_pos))) { + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = -EFAULT; + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; + ? ? ? ? ? ? } + + ? ? ? ? ? ? shadow_protect_win(win, 1); + + ? ? ? ? ? ? /* write 'OSD' registers to set position of the window */ + ? ? ? ? ? ? data = VIDOSDxA_TOPLEFT_X(winpos->win_pos_x) | + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?VIDOSDxA_TOPLEFT_Y(winpos->win_pos_y); + ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(data, sfb->regs + VIDOSD_A(win->index, sfb->variant)); + + ? ? ? ? ? ? data = VIDOSDxB_BOTRIGHT_X( + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? s3c_fb_align_word(info->var.bits_per_pixel, + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (winpos->win_pos_x + info->var.xres - 1))); + ? ? ? ? ? ? data |= VIDOSDxB_BOTRIGHT_Y(winpos->win_pos_y + + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? info->var.yres - 1); + ? ? ? ? ? ? writel(data, sfb->regs + VIDOSD_B(win->index, sfb->variant)); + + ? ? ? ? ? ? shadow_protect_win(win, 0); + ? ? ? ? ? ? break;Can you move this to separate function? In my opinion, it would be better for readability and consistency. Also, FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC has been implemented in this way. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ret = s3c_fb_wait_for_vsync(sfb, crtc); How about adding a function 's3c_fb_set_window_position' for this as belows? +int s3c_fb_set_window_position(struct fb_info *info, + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct s3cfb_window_pos winpos)
Thanks for your suggestion. I have considered it, and now I have written a separate function for this. I will be sending it in V2 version.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?........ + ? ? ? case S3CFB_WIN_POSITION: + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (copy_from_user(winpos, (u32 __user *)arg, + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sizeof(struct s3cfb_window_pos))) { + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = -EFAULT; + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = s3c_fb_set_window_position(info, winpos); + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break;quoted
? ? ? default: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = -ENOTTY; ? ? ? } -- 1.7.0.4